Subject	Yea, c-clamp def wouldn't work on ball joints
Posted by	bartz32tt on May 22, 2014 at 3:57 PM
	This message has been viewed 238 times.
In Reply To	I agree that hammering is not an ideal method for removal. posted by TriniTT on May 22, 2014 at 03:02 PM
Message	At any rate, glad you got it figured out :) ________________Sig Separator________________________ Parting out my entire 1990 twin turbo! Please email me for needed parts! See profile for my WTB/WTT list as well.
Follow Ups	DIY: front lower control arm service - TriniTT 11:46:34 05/22/14 What is the part number for the ball points? - EZdusit (cali) 12:13:34 05/22/14 ES bushings are PN 7.3108, Ingalls ball joint PN IK9819 - TriniTT 11:42:02 05/23/14 good work! (n/m) - Dallas DamonZ 14:18:47 05/22/14 C-clamp > hammering - bartz32tt 14:36:49 05/22/14 I agree that hammering is not an ideal method for removal. - TriniTT 15:02:19 05/22/14 Yea, c-clamp def wouldn't work on ball joints - bartz32tt 15:57:25 05/22/14 Nice, will refer back to this DIY sooner or later (n/m) - ZEngineer 14:40:20 05/22/14 Beautiful work. (n/m) - JMartz 15:25:36 05/22/14 I used the same tool for the ball joint - ZXRider 15:40:25 05/22/14 Are you sure about that Moog PN? They look rather different - Bernie (NoVA) 11:00:30 05/23/14 Moog K9631 is for the Z31. K9819 is for the Z32. - zQuikonE 11:45:46 05/23/14 Thanks - got a pair K9819 and they are correct. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 13:34:35 05/30/14 You're right. - TriniTT 11:46:25 05/23/14 I've been using the Moog ball joints for a few years without - zQuikonE 12:02:27 05/23/14 Yep, I generally prefer Moog joints but when I couldn't - TriniTT 12:08:06 05/23/14 I was almost going to go that route then... - DVDBURN (MD) 14:52:20 05/23/14 Are those Megans? - TriniTT 15:45:01 05/23/14 I saw a couple of different types. - DVDBURN (MD) 16:13:52 05/23/14
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.